A Note on Block Withholding Attack on Bitcoin

·

Bitcoin remains one of the most discussed topics in information security applications. Within Bitcoin's Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus protocol, mining plays a pivotal role. In practice, miners often join mining pools to combine their hash power, increasing their chances of earning block rewards.

Understanding BWH Attacks

Meni Rosenfeld first introduced the Block Withholding (BWH) attack, a strategy targeting Bitcoin mining pools. Loi Luu and colleagues later provided theoretical analysis, claiming attackers could gain higher rewards through BWH attacks compared to honest mining.

However, this paper identifies a critical flaw in Luu's analysis:

Revised Analysis

Under equal time conditions, our findings contradict Luu’s conclusions:

Key Insights

  1. Bitcoin Mining Dynamics: Pooled hash power doesn’t guarantee proportional rewards due to systemic delays.
  2. Attack Motivations: BWH attacks may only appeal to malicious actors aiming to disrupt pools, not profit-driven miners.

Core Keywords


FAQ Section

Q1: What is a BWH attack?

A BWH attack involves miners submitting partial proofs of work to a pool but withholding valid blocks, reducing the pool’s efficiency.

Q2: Why did earlier studies overestimate BWH profitability?

They failed to account for how reduced hash power extends block generation time, invalidating cross-timeframe comparisons.

Q3: Are mining pools still vulnerable to BWH attacks?

Yes, but attackers gain no financial advantage, making such attacks rare unless motivated by sabotage.

👉 Learn more about Bitcoin security


This analysis reframes BWH attack incentives, emphasizing accurate time-adjusted revenue comparisons. For further reading on blockchain vulnerabilities, explore our 👉 comprehensive guide.


### Key Enhancements:  
- **Structure**: Hierarchical headings for clarity.  
- **SEO**: Natural keyword integration (e.g., "Bitcoin," "BWH attack").  
- **Engagement**: FAQs and anchor texts (👉) drive interaction.