Overview of Blockchain Forked Currencies on Bitfinex
In 2017, Bitfinex faced unprecedented complexity as it navigated ten potential blockchain hard fork events. These forks often created three new cryptocurrencies per split—for example, SegWit2x produced:
- BT1: Futures contract redeemable for BTC post-fork
- BT2: Futures contract redeemable for B2X post-fork
- B2X: The actual SegWit2x currency
While Bitfinex provided clients opportunities to trade these forked assets, operational challenges emerged, creating burdens for users. Below is the comprehensive timeline of these events.
2017 Bitfinex Hard Fork Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Fork Origin | Resulting Assets | Margin Long Receives | Margin Short Owes | BTC Lender Receives* | BTC Borrower Owes* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18/03/2017 | Optional Fork | BTC | BCC + BCU | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| 01/08/2017* | Direct Distribution | BTC | BCH | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| 24/10/2017 | Direct Distribution | BTC | BTG | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
*BCH lender coefficient: 0.85. Dates with asterisks denote estimated fork dates.
Margin Trading and Financing Complexities
Cryptocurrency forks introduce unique policy challenges for trading platforms. Bitfinex typically adopted Option 3 or 4 from the framework below, prioritizing fairness but creating operational friction:
Platform Policy Options for Forked Assets
| Policy | Asset Holders | Margin Longs | Margin Shorts | BTC Lenders | BTC Borrowers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Option 1 | Receive | Receive | Exempt | Receive | Exempt |
| Option 2 | Receive | Exempt | Exempt | Receive | Exempt |
| Option 3 | Receive | Receive | Owe | Receive | Owe |
👉 Explore crypto trading strategies
Bitcoin Gold (BTG): The Forced Buyback Controversy
Leveraged BTC shorts faced immediate BTG debt obligations post-fork—a mechanism to balance long positions receiving BTG. This created friction as:
- BTG often didn’t exist physically at the "snapshot date"
- Users had 72 hours to cover debts before automatic buybacks
- Low liquidity risked unfavorable pricing
While imperfect, this approach aimed for equity between long/short positions amid unpredictable fork conditions.
Inter-Fork Asset Conflicts
Fork policies didn’t always harmonize. For example:
- BTC holders received BCH in August, but BCC holders never did
- Potential future scenarios could distribute BTG to BT1 holders during SegWit2x
Such overlaps reveal the inherent complexity of multi-fork environments.
FAQ: Addressing Key Concerns
Q: Why did Bitfinex create futures contracts (BT1/BT2) for forks?
A: To provide price discovery and hedging tools before unstable fork events.
Q: How were BTC borrowers affected by forks?
A: They owed equivalent amounts of new forked assets, sometimes requiring urgent market purchases.
Q: Did Bitfinex profit from forced BTG buybacks?
A: No—automatic buybacks used borrower-collateralized BTC at prevailing market rates.
Q: Could fork policies be more transparent?
A: Retrospectively, yes. However, rapid fork developments often outpaced communication timelines.
👉 Master crypto asset management
Conclusion: Lessons from 2017’s Fork Frenzy
Bitfinex’s 2017 experience highlighted the delicate balance between:
- Supporting innovative assets
- Maintaining platform stability
- Treating user groups equitably
While imperfect, their handling of simultaneous forks set benchmarks for the industry—proving that even controversial decisions can drive crypto infrastructure forward.