Blockworks Research: Limitations That May Prevent TON from Becoming the Next SOL or ETH

·

Market participants overestimate Telegram's user engagement. TON faces constraints in its programming language and Telegram's end-market distribution, compounded by its excessively high FDV.

Telegram's Lower-Than-Expected User Engagement

Telegram boasts global influence with substantial daily active users (DAU), theoretically funneling users to TON. By this metric, Telegram ranks among the world's most-used apps.

According to Telegram's data:

This indicates weaker market penetration and monetizable user base than projected.

EVM Incompatibility and Niche Programming Languages

TON’s ecosystem faces development hurdles due to:

Geographic Limitations in End-Market Coverage

TON’s growth narrative assumes Telegram will mirror WeChat’s dominance—but WeChat serves a concentrated Chinese market, while Telegram’s user base is fragmented:

Top 2022 Download Regions:

This dispersion complicates scalability for startups leveraging Telegram’s distribution.

Overvalued FDV Metrics

Despite potential, TON’s valuation lacks safety margins:

👉 Explore high-potential blockchain projects to diversify beyond overextended valuations.


FAQ: TON Network Viability

Q: Can TON overcome its EVM incompatibility?
A: Unlikely without significant architectural shifts or layer-2 solutions bridging to EVM chains.

Q: Why does Telegram’s DAU/MAU ratio matter?
A: Low ratios signal weaker habitual use, reducing sustainable demand for TON-based apps.

Q: Is FunC a dealbreaker for developers?
A: Yes—most prioritize ecosystems with Rust/Solidity support to leverage existing skills.

Q: How might TON improve its market positioning?
A: Strategic partnerships in high-adoption regions (e.g., India) could offset geographic fragmentation.

👉 Compare TON’s metrics against leading Layer 1s for deeper investment insights.


Content synthesized from Blockworks Research and PANews. Hyperlinks removed per guidelines.